What 16mm Taught Me That Digital Never Did

I love digital cameras. I use them regularly, and I’m grateful for what they’ve enabled. But everything I know about discipline, preparation, and decision-making as a cinematographer came from shooting 16mm — and digital has never quite replaced those lessons.

When you shoot 16mm, the medium itself forces you to think differently. Film is finite. Every roll has a cost. Every foot that passes through the gate matters. You don’t roll “just in case.” You don’t discover the scene in the edit. You prepare, you rehearse, and when the camera runs, you commit.

That mindset stays with me still.

⸻

Limitation as a Teacher

Most of the 16mm work I came up on was shot at around a 6:1 ratio. That wasn’t an aesthetic choice — it was economic reality. With such tight margins, indecision wasn’t an option. Directors knew what they wanted before the camera rolled. Actors rehearsed properly. Crews were focused, present, and engaged.

On the set of a Short Film being shot back in the early 90s. Unfortunately I can’t remember the names of anyone in this photo! Picture taken by me.

You learned very quickly when not to roll. That sounds simple, but it’s a discipline digital doesn’t naturally enforce. When the cost of rolling is effectively zero, the default becomes “let’s just go again.” On film, every take had to justify its existence.

Those constraints didn’t stifle creativity — they sharpened it.

⸻

Exposure Was a Decision, Not a Safety Net

Shooting film taught me that exposure is a choice, not a safety net. There was no waveform to lean on, no false comfort in knowing you could fix it later. You read the light, you trusted your meter, and you trusted your eye.

Spot meters, grey scales, careful testing — these weren’t optional extras. They were part of the language of the medium. If you underexposed, you lived with it. If you overexposed, you lived with that too. Those mistakes stayed with you, and because they stayed with you, you didn’t repeat them.

Digital encourages experimentation, which is valuable. But film taught responsibility. It taught you that every decision leaves a physical trace.

⸻

Performance Changed When Film Was Rolling

One of the most overlooked lessons of shooting 16mm is how it affects performance. When actors know the camera is only going to roll a handful of times, something shifts. Focus sharpens. Energy concentrates. The moment matters more.

On film sets, you could feel it when the camera turned over. There was a collective awareness that this was the take. That sense of occasion is harder to maintain when the camera can roll endlessly, and the cost of another take is essentially nothing.

Film didn’t just discipline crews — it disciplined performances.

⸻

What Digital Gave Us — And What It Took Away

Digital has given filmmakers extraordinary freedom. It has lowered barriers, democratised access, and enabled voices that might never have been heard otherwise. That matters, and it shouldn’t be dismissed.

But it also introduced a kind of creative drift. Endless takes. Endless options. A quiet erosion of commitment. Decisions deferred rather than made.

I don’t think this is a failure of digital cameras — it’s a consequence of abundance. Film, by contrast, forces clarity. It demands intention.

⸻

Why These Lessons Still Matter

What’s interesting now is that these lessons are finding their way back into contemporary filmmaking. Through organisations like the Salford Celluloid Centre of Excellence, new crews are being trained in film discipline — not as nostalgia, but as craft. With new stocks from Kodak, ORWO etc and engineering innovations like the Logmar Magellan, celluloid isn’t just surviving; it’s evolving.

The resurgence of large-format film and renewed interest in 16mm and 35mm isn’t about resisting progress. It’s about reclaiming a way of working that values preparation, commitment, and physical consequence.

⸻

Final Thoughts

Whether you’re shooting a short on 16mm, a feature on 65mm, or a digital series for streaming, the principle is the same: limitation sharpens intent. Film simply teaches that lesson earlier — and more firmly — than anything else I’ve encountered.

Digital is an incredible tool. But 16mm taught me how to be a cinematographer.

Mark